Sunday, November 13, 2022

Chris


What a difference a shepherd makes . . .


"Then came the Jews round about him, and said unto him, How long dost thou make us to doubt? If thou be the Christ, tell us plainly." - John 10:24


IMG_9770.jpeg

When trust is withheld - fear of pain

https://tinyurl.com/mtkvftfc


Good Lord I want to be like Chris

https://tinyurl.com/3n7umvxn


Do I have An untrusting heart and a Critical attitude that keeps putting 

others on trial ? UNBELIEF!  

https://tinyurl.com/mr2pnh27



25Jesus answered them, I told you, and ye believed not: the works that I do in my Father's name, they bear witness of me. 26But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you. 27My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: 28And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. 29My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand. 30I and myFather are one.

Wednesday, November 9, 2022

Same


Are we Better than they?

Catholics, Baptists, Republicans, Pentecostals, Gays whatever . . . 

Galatians 3:22

the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe


https://tinyurl.com/87v6ynys

Whoever it is that I think 

I am better or worse than


Am I deceived?

Wednesday, November 2, 2022

POKE


Pocket Monster?

Criticisms and controversies


Morality and religious beliefs

Pokémon has been criticized by some fundamentalist Christians over perceived occult and violentthemes and the concept of "Pokémon evolution", which they feel goes against the Biblical creation account in Genesis.[63] Sat2000, a satellite television station based in Vatican City, has countered that the Pokémon Trading Card Game and video games are "full of inventive imagination" and have no "harmful moral side effects".[64][65] In the United Kingdom, the "Christian Power Cards" game was introduced in 1999 by David Tate who stated, "Some people aren't happy with Pokémon and want an alternative, others just want Christian games." The game was similar to the Pokémon Trading Card Game but used Biblical figures.[66]

In 1999, Nintendo stopped manufacturing the Japanese version of the "Koga's Ninja Trick" trading card because it depicted a manji, a traditionally Buddhist symbol with no negative connotations. The Jewishcivil rights group Anti-Defamation League complained because the symbol is the reverse of a swastika, a Nazi symbol. The cards were intended for sale in Japan only, but the popularity of Pokémon led to import into the United States with approval from Nintendo. The Anti-Defamation League understood that the portrayed symbol was not intended to offend and acknowledged the sensitivity that Nintendo showed by removing the product.[67][68]

In 1999, two nine-year-old boys from Merrick, New York, sued Nintendo because they claimed the Pokémon Trading Card Game caused their problematic gambling.[69]

In 2001, Saudi Arabia banned Pokémon games and the trading cards, alleging that the franchise promoted Zionism by displaying the Star of David in the trading cards (the Colorless energy from the Pokémon Trading Card Game resembles a six-pointed star) as well as other religious symbols such as crosses they associated with Christianity and triangles they associated with Freemasonry; the games also involved gambling, which is in violation of Muslim doctrine.[70][71]

Pokémon has also been accused of promoting materialism.[72]

Animal cruelty

In 2012, PETA criticized the concept of Pokémon as supporting cruelty to animals. PETA compared the game's concept, of capturing animals and forcing them to fight, to cockfightsdog fighting rings and circuses, events frequently criticized for cruelty to animals. PETA released a game spoofing Pokémonwhere the Pokémon battle their trainers to win their freedom.[73] PETA reaffirmed their objections in 2016 with the release of Pokémon Go, promoting the hashtag #GottaFreeThemAll.[74]

Health

Main article: Dennō Senshi Porygon

See also: Burger King Pokémon container recall

On December 16, 1997, more than 635 Japanese children were admitted to hospitals with epileptic seizures.[75] It was determined the seizures were caused by watching an episode of Pokémon "Dennō Senshi Porygon", (most commonly translated "Electric Soldier Porygon", season 1, episode 38); as a result, this episode has not been aired since. In this particular episode, there were bright explosions with rapidly alternating blue and red color patterns.[76] It was determined in subsequent research that these strobing light effects cause some individuals to have epileptic seizures, even if the person had no previous history of epilepsy.[77] This incident is a common focus of Pokémon-related parodies in other media, and was lampooned by The Simpsons episode "Thirty Minutes over Tokyo" in a short cameo[78] and the South Park episode "Chinpokomon",[79] among others.

Monster in My Pocket

In March 2000, Morrison Entertainment Group, a toy developer based at Manhattan Beach, California, sued Nintendo over claims that Pokémon infringed on its own Monster in My Pocket characters. A judge ruled there was no infringement and Morrison appealed the ruling. On February 4, 2003, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the decision by the District Court to dismiss the suit.[80]


Pokémon Go

See also: Criticism and incidents

Within its first two days of release, Pokémon Go raised safety concerns among players. Multiple people also suffered minor injuries from falling while playing the game due to being distracted.[81]

Multiple police departments in various countries have issued warnings, some tongue-in-cheek, regarding inattentive driving, trespassing, and being targeted by criminals due to being unaware of one's surroundings.[82][83] People have suffered various injuries from accidents related to the game,[84][85][86][87] and Bosnian players have been warned to stay out of minefields left over from the 1990s Bosnian War.[88] On July 20, 2016, it was reported that an 18-year-old boy in ChiquimulaGuatemala, was shot and killed while playing the game in the late evening hours. This was the first reported death in connection with the app. The boy's 17-year-old cousin, who was accompanying the victim, was shot in the foot. Police speculated that the shooters used the game's GPS capability to find the two.[89]

New


3 Scammers scamming

The God of the ALGORITHMS 


https://www.osc.org/popular-science-myths-debunked-•-clearing-up-misconceptions/


According to the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, to "debunk" is defined as: "to expose the sham or falseness of." The New Oxford American Dictionary defines "debunk" as "expose the falseness or hollowness of (a myth, idea, or belief)"


https://youtu.be/fH66n2r867A

#MustBuythemTrunks

Calves


  1. an idea, custom, or institution held, especially unreasonably, to be above criticism (with reference to the Hindus' respect for the cow as a sacred animal).
    "the sacred cow of monetarism"

Tuesday, November 1, 2022

TheTest


TAKE TIME TO BE HOLY

https://youtu.be/rFApbg-wcmE



REPENTING OF . . . 

Sinfulness Stubbornness Stupidity 

Being Silly Sinful Stubborn or Stupid? 


a) often 

b) always

c) sometimes

d) never

e) seldom 


rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry.


Who can understand his errors? cleanse thou me from secret faults.


Keep back thy servant also from presumptuous sins; let them not have dominion over me


Let the words of my mouth, and the meditation of my heart, be acceptable in thy sight, O LORD, my strength, and my redeemer.


Discussion Debate Discourse

Have we become incapable 

of 'healthy' conversation?


PASSIONATE?

opinionated 

intolerant 

Quarrelsome 

accusatory 

Argumentative

bigoted 

belligerent 


Pedantic?

is an insulting word used to describe someone who annoys others by correcting small errors, caring too much about minor details, or emphasizing their own expertise especially in some narrow or boring subject matter.


Puerile ?

Silly or trivial, esp. in a childish 

way or as a result of immaturity


+++++++++++++


The willingness for dialogue 

Civil discourse & Rules of 'engagement'


Has the general purpose of normal social intercourse changed from friendly, encouraging and informational to hostile, competitive and belittling?


In the present polarized climate one must need tread very carefully in conversation. 


It does seem to be the 'reality' if social media content is used as a measure of 'conversation quality'


GROUND RULES

  1. Willingness to examine beliefs 
  2. Recognize needs for affirmation 
  3. Accept differing preferences 
  4. Separate the idea from the person
  5. Be open to 'new' possibilities 


Converse


https://www.realtalkphilosophy.org/guidelines

Tested


Being Silly Sinful Stubborn or Stupid? 


a) often 

b) always

c) sometimes

d) never

e) seldom 


rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry.


Who can understand his errors? cleanse thou me from secret faults.


Keep back thy servant also from presumptuous sins; let them not have dominion over me


Let the words of my mouth, and the meditation of my heart, be acceptable in thy sight, O LORD, my strength, and my redeemer.


Discussion Debate Discourse

Have we become incapable 

of 'healthy' conversation?


PASSIONATE?

opinionated 

intolerant 

Quarrelsome 

accusatory 

Argumentative

bigoted 

belligerent 


Pedantic?

is an insulting word used to describe someone who annoys others by correcting small errors, caring too much about minor details, or emphasizing their own expertise especially in some narrow or boring subject matter.


Puerile ?

Silly or trivial, esp. in a childish 

way or as a result of immaturity


+++++++++++++


The willingness for dialogue 

Civil discourse & Rules of 'engagement'


Has the general purpose of normal social intercourse changed from friendly, encouraging and informational to hostile, competitive and belittling?


In the present polarized climate one must need tread very carefully in conversation. 


It does seem to be the 'reality' if social media content is used as a measure of 'conversation quality'


GROUND RULES

  1. Willingness to examine beliefs 
  2. Recognize needs for affirmation 
  3. Accept differing preferences 
  4. Separate the idea from the person
  5. Be open to 'new' possibilities 


Converse


https://www.realtalkphilosophy.org/guidelines